Rc/136/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M.suryanarayana Lic Development Officer
High Court
03 Apr 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/136/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M.suryanarayana Lic Development Officer
Date of order
03 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rc/136/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M.suryanarayana Lic Development Officer, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDHON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
R.C.NO.136 OF 2000
DATED: 03.04.2012
Between
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXA.P II, HYDERABAD … Applicant
And
SRI M.SURYANARAYANALIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,NANDYAL … Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDHON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
R.C.NO.136 OF 2000
Order:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur)
The tax effect in this case is said to be less than Rs.1,00,000/-.
2. Hence, we are not inclined to entertain this Referred Case.3. The Referred Case is dismissed with costs of Rs.1,000/-(Rupees one thousand only) to be paid to the A.P. State LegalService Authority, Hyderabad within two weeks.
4. List for compliance on 4.7.2012.
___________________
MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ
___________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
Dt: 03-04-2012
tnb
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDHON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
R.C.NO.136 OF 2000
Order:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur)
tnb
DATED: 03-04-2012.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue