Case LawHigh Court › Rc/148/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Ta...

Rc/148/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gurukul Ghatkeswar Trust

High Court 04 Apr 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/148/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gurukul Ghatkeswar Trust
Date of order
04 Apr 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rc/148/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Gurukul Ghatkeswar Trust, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

REFERRED CASE NO.148 OF 2000 DATED:4.4.2012 Between:The Commissioner of Income TaxA.P. –IHyderabad … Petitioner And M/s. Gurukul Ghatkeswar TrustGhatkeswar … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURAND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR REFERRED CASE NO.148 OF 2000 ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) On 27.7.2009, a Division Bench had passed an order that theoffice objections should be removed within eight weeks, failing whichthe case shall stand dismissed for default without further reference tothe Court. 2. There is nothing to suggest that the office objections have beenremoved. 3. Under the circumstances, this referred case stands dismissed fordefault in terms of the order dt.27.7.2009. __________________ MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ __________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 4-4-2012 bnr
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan