Rc/18/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ap 11 Hyd v. Ap State Civil Supplies Corporation Hyd
High Court
04 Jan 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/18/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ap 11 Hyd v. Ap State Civil Supplies Corporation Hyd
Date of order
04 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rc/18/2000 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Ap 11 Hyd v. Ap State Civil Supplies Corporation Hyd, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the A.P.State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, is aCharitable Institution within the meaning of Sec.2(15) of theIncome Tax Act particularly having regard to the provisions ofSec.11(4A)(b) of the Act?
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
REFERRED CASE Nos.18 and 74 of 2000
Dated:04.01.2012
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax,A.P.II, Hyderabad.
…Applicant
and
A.P.State Civil Supplies Corporation,Hyderabad.
…Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
REFERRED CASE Nos.18 and 74 of 2000
COMMON ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
In R.C.No.18 of 2000 at the instance of the Revenue, theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal referred the following questionunder Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), forthe opinion of this Court.
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the A.P.State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, is aCharitable Institution within the meaning of Sec.2(15) of theIncome Tax Act particularly having regard to the provisions ofSec.11(4A)(b) of the Act?
In R.C.No.74 of 2000 the Appellate Tribunal referred thefollowing question under Section 256(1) of the Act for the opinionof this Court.
Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase, the ITAT is correct in law in holding that the assessee isa charitable institution within the meaning of Sec.2(15) of theI.T.Act and the income is exempt u/s.11 of the I.T.Act.
During the course of submissions, it is brought to our noticethat in Commissioner of Income Tax v A.P. State Civil SuppliedCorporation (R.C.No.59 of 1992, dated 04.03.2003), a similarquestion was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assesseeand against the Revenue.
Following the order in R.C.No.59 of 1992 the reference isanswered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee and againstthe Revenue.
Referred Cases are disposed of accordingly. There shall beno order as to costs.
_______________
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
____________________
(B.N.RAO NALLA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.