Case LawHigh Court › Rc/19/1997 Of Hotel Banjara Ltd.hyderaba...

Rc/19/1997 Of Hotel Banjara Ltd.hyderabad v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax A.p-I Hyd

High Court 01 Dec 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/19/1997 Of Hotel Banjara Ltd.hyderabad v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax A.p-I Hyd
Date of order
01 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
1985-86
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rc/19/1997 Of Hotel Banjara Ltd.hyderabad v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax A.p-I Hyd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA REFERRED CASE No.19 of 199701.12.2011 Between: Hotel Banjara Limited, Hyderabad … Petitioner AND The Commissioner of Income-tax, AP-II, Hyderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA REFERRED CASE No.19 of 1997 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) In this Referred Case for the assessment years 1982–83 to1986–87 the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal referred five questionsfor opinion of this Court. In addition, three questions pertaining toassessment years 1984-85, 1985-86 and 1986-87 and two morequestions pertaining to the assessment year 1985-86 are alsoreferred. The assessee is served but none appears for theassessee. Therefore, we decline to answer the reference. The Referred Case shall stand disposed of accordingly. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) ____________________ (B.N.RAO NALLA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan