Rc/36/2002 Of Hotel Asrani (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
23 Jul 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/36/2002 Of Hotel Asrani (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rc/36/2002 Of Hotel Asrani (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case the appellant is entitledto depreciation on the hotel building at the ratesapplicable to a Plant?Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case the extra shiftallowance on Plant and Machinery including AirConditioner, Sanitary Fittin...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
R.C.No.36 of 2002
ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy)
This reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act,1961, at the instance of the assessee, is made by the HyderabadBench ‘A’ of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, through its order,dated 12.02.2001 in R.A.Nos.908 and 909/Hyd/95 in I.T.A.Nos.208and 209/Hyd/1988, framing the following questions:
1.
“Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case initial depreciationu/s.32(1)(v) is admissible on the newconstructions or extensions of the hotel building inthe year in which the construction or extensionstake place?
2.
Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case the appellant is entitledto depreciation on the hotel building at the ratesapplicable to a Plant?Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case the extra shiftallowance on Plant and Machinery including AirConditioner, Sanitary Fittings, Lift, etc. isadmissible in the case of the appellant?
3.
4.
Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case the appellant is entitledto claim investment allowance u/s.32(1)(v) on thenew additions to the hotel building made duringthis year?”
We are handicapped from dealing with the matter on merits,
on account of the fact that no appearance is entered before thisCourt on behalf of the assessee, i.e. the applicant before theTribunal.
Hence, we decline to answer the reference.
____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
_____________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
Date:23.07.2014GJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.