Case LawHigh Court › Rc/41/1997 Of The Commissioner Of Income...

Rc/41/1997 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Visakha v. Chodavaram Co-Op.sugars Ltd

High Court 12 Nov 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/41/1997 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Visakha v. Chodavaram Co-Op.sugars Ltd
Date of order
12 Nov 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rc/41/1997 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Visakha v. Chodavaram Co-Op.sugars Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.41 OF 1997 ORDER:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) Learned standing counsel for the Income Tax Departmentsubmits that the issue raised in this Referred Case squarely coveredby the order dated 08.06.1998 of the Division Bench of this Court inIncome Tax Case No.72 of 1997. In view of the said submission, wedecline to answer the reference. Accordingly, the Referred Case is dismissed. No order as tocosts. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Referred Caseshall stand disposed of. ______________________ G. CHANDRAIAH,J Date:12.11.2013.Gk. ____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM Gk R.C.No.41 OF 1997 Date:12.11.2013.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan