Case Law › High Court › Rc/49/2000 Of Trustees Of H.e.h. Nizams...

Rc/49/2000 Of Trustees Of H.e.h. Nizams Jewellary v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax.a.p.hyd

High Court 13 Mar 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/49/2000 Of Trustees Of H.e.h. Nizams Jewellary v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax.a.p.hyd
Date of order
13 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rc/49/2000 Of Trustees Of H.e.h. Nizams Jewellary v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax.a.p.hyd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDHON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR R.C.NO.49 OF 2000 DATED: 13.03.2012 Between TRUSTEES OF HEH THE NIZAM’SJUBILEE PAVILION TRUST,HYDERABAD … ApplicantAndCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAP I,HYDERABAD … Respondent HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURAND HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR R.C.NO.49 OF 2000 Order:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) The tax effect in this case is said to be less than Rs.1.00 lakh. Under the circumstances, we decline to entertain this Referred Case. Accordingly, this Referred Case is dismissed. ___________________MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ ___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J Dt: 13-03-2012 tnb HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDHON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR R.C.NO.49 OF 2000 Order:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) DATED: 13.03.2012
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan