In Rc/52/2000 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax.visakha v. M.venkataramayya, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDHON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
R.C.NO.52 OF 2000
DATED: 13.03.2012
Between COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,VISAKHAPATNAM … ApplicantAndSRI MATTAPALLI VENKATARAMAYYARAJAHMUNDRY … Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDHON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
R.C.NO.52 OF 2000
Order:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur)
Process fee has not been paid for service of notice on therespondent for the last 10 years.Accordingly, this Referred Case is dismissed for non-prosecution.
___________________
MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ
___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Dt: 13-03-2012
tnb
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDHON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
R.C.NO.52 OF 2000
Order:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur)
DATED: 13.03.2012
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue