Case LawHigh Court › Rc/53/1998 Of Commr.of Income Tax Vsp v....

Rc/53/1998 Of Commr.of Income Tax Vsp v. Garapati Family Trust Kakinada

High Court 08 Dec 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/53/1998 Of Commr.of Income Tax Vsp v. Garapati Family Trust Kakinada
Date of order
08 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Rc/53/1998 Of Commr.of Income Tax Vsp v. Garapati Family Trust Kakinada, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal isjustified in directing the A.O to tax at themaximum marginal rates only the income ofeach beneficiary and not the aggregate incomeof all the beneficiaries in the hands of theTrust?

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLAREFERRED CASE Nos.262 of 1996; 39 and 53 of1998 Dated:08.12.2011 Between: The Commissioner of Income Tax,Visakhapatnam. …Applicant and M/s.Rajya Lakshmi Family Trust,Kakinada,And others. …Respondents THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA REFERRED CASE Nos.262 of 1996; 39 and 53 of1998 COMMON ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao) As a common issue would arise in all these threeReferred Cases, they are being disposed of by thiscommon order. In R.C.No.262 of 1996 at the instance of theCommissioner of Income Tax, the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Hyderabad Bench “B”, referred the followingquestion for the opinion of this Court. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal isjustified in directing the A.O to tax at themaximum marginal rates only the income ofeach beneficiary and not the aggregate incomeof all the beneficiaries in the hands of theTrust? In R.C.No.39 of 1998 at the instance of theCommissioner of Income Tax, the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Hyderabad Bench “B”, referred the followingquestion for the opinion of this Court. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal isjustified in directing the A.O to tax at themaximum marginal rates only the income ofeach beneficiary and not the aggregate incomeof all the beneficiaries in the hands of theTrust? In R.C.No.53 of 1998 at the instance of theCommissioner of Income Tax, the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Hyderabad Bench “B”, referred the followingquestion for the opinion of this Court. Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the Tribunal isjustified in directing the A.O to tax at themaximum marginal rates only the income ofeach beneficiary and not the aggregate incomeof all the beneficiaries in the hands of theTrust? The question referred is squarely covered by ouranswer in R.C.No.229 of 1996, dated 25.11.2011. Following the same, the question is answered in theaffirmative in favour of the assessee and against theRevenue. These Referred Cases shall stand disposed ofaccordingly. _______________ (V.V.S.RAO, J) 08.12.2011vs ____________________ (B.N.RAO NALLA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan