Case LawHigh Court › Rc/61/1997 Of The Commissioner Of Income...

Rc/61/1997 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. A.p.state Civil Supplies Corpn.ltd

High Court 08 Jun 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/61/1997 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. A.p.state Civil Supplies Corpn.ltd
Date of order
08 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rc/61/1997 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd v. A.p.state Civil Supplies Corpn.ltd, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Issue: Meena Kumari) In this case, under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, thefollowing question is referred to this Court for opinion: “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the ITAT is correct in law in holding that theassessee is a charitable institution within the meaning...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI& THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO REFERRED CASE NO :61 of 1997 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) In this case, under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, thefollowing question is referred to this Court for opinion: “Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case, the ITAT is correct in law in holding that theassessee is a charitable institution within the meaning ofSection 2 (15) of the I.T. Act and its income is exemptfrom tax?” When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by both the Counselthat the above referred question is covered by a judgment of a DivisionBench this Court in R.C.No.59 of 1992, dated 4.3.2003. Following the above judgment, the above referred question isanswered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee. Accordingly, the reference is answered. __________________________ Justice T. Meena Kumari _____________________________ Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao Date: 8[th] June, 2010 nn. THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE T.MEENA KUMARI& THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO REFERRED CASE NO : 61 of 1997(Order delivered by the Hon’ble Smt. Justice T. Meena Kumari) 8/06/2010
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan