Rc/7/1997 Of Coromandal Fertilisers Hyd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd
High Court
30 Nov 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/7/1997 Of Coromandal Fertilisers Hyd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd
Date of order
30 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rc/7/1997 Of Coromandal Fertilisers Hyd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Issue: 1.Whether the facts and in the circumstances of the case, theTribunal was correct in assessing the amount ofRs.23,15,229/- received as cash compensatory allowance asincome on the basis of accrual for the asst. year 1989-90when the said income was accounted on the cash basis in theyear of receipt in...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOAND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
REFERRED CASE No.7 OF 1997
Dated:30.11.2011
Between:
Jindal Ferro Alloys Limited,Visakhapatnam.. Applicant AndThe Commissioner of Income-tax,Vizag .. Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
REFERRED CASE No.7 OF 1997
ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
M/s.Jindal Ferro Alloys Limited, Visakhapatnam (the assessee)got the following two questions referred to the opinion of this Court
under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
1.Whether the facts and in the circumstances of the case, theTribunal was correct in assessing the amount ofRs.23,15,229/- received as cash compensatory allowance asincome on the basis of accrual for the asst. year 1989-90when the said income was accounted on the cash basis in theyear of receipt in asst. year 1990-91?Tribunal was correct in assessing the amount ofRs.23,15,229/- received as cash compensatory allowance asincome on the basis of accrual for the asst. year 1989-90when the said income was accounted on the cash basis in theyear of receipt in asst. year 1990-91?
2.Whether the facts and in the circumstances of the case, theTribunal was correct in rejecting assessee’s contention thatthe cash compensatory allowance of Rs.23,15,229/- cannot beassessed to tax for the asst. year 1989-90 rejecting the cashsystem of accounting adopted for accounting of the saidsource of income?Tribunal was correct in rejecting assessee’s contention thatthe cash compensatory allowance of Rs.23,15,229/- cannot beassessed to tax for the asst. year 1989-90 rejecting the cashsystem of accounting adopted for accounting of the saidsource of income?
When the matter is called, Sri Y.Ratnakar, counsel for theassessee, submits that his client is no more interested to pursue thematter. In that view of the matter, we decline to answer the questionsreferred to this Court.
The Referred Case shall stand disposed of accordingly.
________________
(V.V.S. RAO, J)
30.11.2011
KH
_____________________
(B.N.RAO NALLA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.