Case Law › High Court › Rc/78/2001 Of Turbo-Lafttcchnik Gmbtt Re...

Rc/78/2001 Of Turbo-Lafttcchnik Gmbtt Rep. Ispatnigam v. Commissioner Of Income Tax V'patnam

High Court 04 May 2021 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · aphc

Parties

Date of order

04 May 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rc/78/2001 Of Turbo-Lafttcchnik Gmbtt Rep. Ispatnigam v. Commissioner Of Income Tax V'patnam, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI R.C No.78 OF 2001 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner Sri A.V.A. Siva Kartikeya, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present case with a liberty to reagitate the case in case the settlement under the direct tax Vivaad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, could not be arrived at. 2. Permission for withdrawal is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this R.C is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. No costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date:04.05.2021. Gk _______________ J.UMA DEVI, J Gk THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI R.C No.78 OF 2001 Date:04.05.2021

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.