Case LawHigh Court › Rc/8/1991 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax...

Rc/8/1991 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nb. Hasham Jah Bahadur

High Court 20 Jan 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/8/1991 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nb. Hasham Jah Bahadur
Date of order
20 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rc/8/1991 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nb. Hasham Jah Bahadur, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDTHE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR REFERRED CASE NO.8 OF1991 DATED:20.1.2012 Between: Commissioner of Income TaxKarnataka CentralBangalore … PetitionerAnd Nb. Hasham Jah BahadurHyderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDTHE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR REFERRED CASE NO.8 OF 1991 ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) Learned counsel for the Revenue says that the tax effect in this case isRs.39,000/-. 2. We decline to interfere with the matter which has been pending for thelast twenty years and some of the respondents are un-served still. 3. Dismissed. Application to bring on record the legal representatives ofthe assessee also stands dismissed. __________________ MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ 20-1-2012 _______________ SANJAY KUMAR, J bnr
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan