Rc/8/1996 Of The Comm.of Income Tax.hyd v. K.visweswara Rao
High Court
26 Dec 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/8/1996 Of The Comm.of Income Tax.hyd v. K.visweswara Rao
Date of order
26 Dec 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rc/8/1996 Of The Comm.of Income Tax.hyd v. K.visweswara Rao, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
REFERRED CASE No.8 of 1996
Dated:26.12.2011
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Andhra Pradesh – II, Hyderabad.
…Applicant
and
Sri K.Visweswara Rao,Godavarikhani.
…Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
REFERRED CASE No.8 of 1996
ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.V.S.Rao)
This case has been referred to this Court under Section256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in January 1996. During thependency, the assessee died. This Court gave sufficientopportunity to the Revenue to bring the legal representatives of thedeceased assessee on record. Indeed, on 24.07.2009 the firstDivision Bench of this Court passed the following order.
Office objections should be removed within eight weeksfrom today, failing which the case shall stand dismissed fordefault, without further reference to the Court.
The petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice tothe respondent through the Department and file proof of service.
Thereafter, this Court on 30.11.2011 granted further weekstime for taking steps. No such steps have been taken, nor anapplication to bring the legal representatives on record has been
filed.
In the factual background, we are not inclined to answer thereference. The reference is accordingly returned to the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench “B”.
The Referred Case shall stand disposed of accordinglywithout any order as to costs.
_______________
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
26.12.2011vs
____________________(B.N.RAO NALLA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.