Case LawHigh Court › Rc/9/2004 Of M/S. Feno Plast Ltd v. The...

Rc/9/2004 Of M/S. Feno Plast Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 25 Jan 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Rc/9/2004 Of M/S. Feno Plast Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rc/9/2004 Of M/S. Feno Plast Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI Referred Case No.9 of 2004 Order: (per V.Ramasubramanian, J.) The value of the appeal out of which this reference has been made, is less than the monetary ceiling limit fixed by the Circulars. Therefore, we decline to answer the reference. Accordingly, the referred case is dismissed. However, if the Department finds that the case falls under anyone of the exceptions, liberty is given to them to move this Court. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this referred case shall stand closed. No costs. ___________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J. 25[th] January, 2017. Ak _______________ J.UMA DEVI, J. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI Referred Case No.9 of 2004(per VRS, J.) 25[th] January, 2017.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan