In Reena Khatau v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Taxcentral Range-7, Mumbai And Anr, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.03.0414:33:59+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1131 OF 2021
Reena Khatau
...Petitioner
vs.
Joint Commissioner of Income TaxCentral Range-7, Mumbai and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr.P.C. Tripathi a/w. Mr. Sashi Tulsiyan for petitioner.Mr.Sham V. Walve for respondents-revenue.
CORAM :K.R. SHRIRAM &
N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE : 1[st] MARCH, 2022
P.C.:
1.Mr.Tripathi seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
2.Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
3.Liberty to raise all contentions before the concerned
authority.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.