Case Law › High Court › Remarkable Fiscal Co.pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Com...

Remarkable Fiscal Co.pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 3(3), Mumbai.). ....... Respondant

High Court 15 Sep 2008 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

15 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Remarkable Fiscal Co.pvt. Ltd v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 3(3), Mumbai.). ....... Respondant, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 584 OF 2005 Remarkable Fiscal Co.Pvt. Ltd........Appellant versus Dy. Commissioner of Income tax special Range 3(3), Mumbai.). ....... Respondant. Mr. K.R. Bhujale for the appellant Mr. Vimal Gupta for respondent. CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 15th SEPTEMBER, 2008. P.C.: 1.The counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw theappeal. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. CHIEF JUSTICE A.P. DESHPANDE, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.