Remedy. It Is Settled That Ordinarily Writ Petition/Appeal Shall Not Be Entertained, Where There Exists An Alternative And Efficacious Remedy (See: Commissioner v. Chhabil Dass Agarwal[3
High Court
14 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Remedy. It Is Settled That Ordinarily Writ Petition/Appeal Shall Not Be Entertained, Where There Exists An Alternative And Efficacious Remedy (See: Commissioner v. Chhabil Dass Agarwal[3
Date of order
14 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Remedy. It Is Settled That Ordinarily Writ Petition/Appeal Shall Not Be Entertained, Where There Exists An Alternative And Efficacious Remedy (See: Commissioner v. Chhabil Dass Agarwal[3, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal under Section 4, Section 246A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Resultantly, this writ appeal fails and it is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14 DAY OF JUNE, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
-WRIT APPEAL NO.311 OF 2022 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
KODAVOOR VYAVASAYA SEVA SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHA 16-62, KODAVOOR POST KODAVOOR UDUPI-576 106 REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO MR. SUDHAKAR
AGE :46 YRS …APPELLANT
(BY SHRI. MAHESH R. UPPIN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. ASSESSING OFFICER NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 001NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 001
2. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 AND TPS AAYAKARBHAVAN ADI-UDUPI MALPE ROAD
UDUPI 576 103 …RESPONDENTS
. . . .
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 11.02.2022 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP NO.20091/2021 (T-IT) AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARINGTHIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
Kodavoor Vyavasaya Sevasahakari Sangha Niyamitha, a Co-operative Society has challenged the order dated February 11, 2022 passed W.P. No.20091/2021.
in
2. After considering the appeal[1], the ITAT[2], remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration with certain directions. After remand, the Assessing Officer has passed fresh orders on September 20, 2021. Appellant challenged the same in the instant writ petition. The Hon'ble Single Judge, by the impugned order has dismissed the writ petition reserving liberty to file appeal under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act,
1 ITA No.707/Bang/2019
2 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
1961 which in fact, is the right alternative and efficacious
remedy. It is settled that ordinarily writ petition/appeal shall not be entertained, where there exists an alternative and efficacious remedy (See: Commissioner of Income Tax and others Vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal[3])
3. Hence, no exception can be taken to the order passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge. Resultantly, this writ appeal fails and it is accordingly dismissed.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SPS
32014(1) SCC 603 (para 15)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.