In Renuka Bishnoi v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 3 & Anr, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R22.03.2024 The writ petition stands dismissed, on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, as having rendered infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~31
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 573/2022
RENUKA BISHNOI
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kumail Abbas, Adv.
versus
%
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 3 & ANR. ..... Respondents
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC with Ms. Nupur Sharma & Mr. Parth Semwal, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R22.03.2024
The writ petition stands dismissed, on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, as having rendered infructuous.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MARCH 22, 2024/kk
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue