Rep. By Its Registrar, Dr.m.b.aswath Narayanan)69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
08 Apr 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Rep. By Its Registrar, Dr.m.b.aswath Narayanan)69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
08 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
2019-20, 2017-18
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rep. By Its Registrar, Dr.m.b.aswath Narayanan)69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 10 of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
W.P. No.11670 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.04.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
W.P. No.11670 of 2022andW.M.P.Nos.11136, 11139 and 11140 of 2022
The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University,
(Rep. by its Registrar, Dr.M.B.Aswath Narayanan)69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.PAN:AACAT 0098E
.. Petitioner(s)
Vs.
1. The Income Tax Officer,
National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi,
E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi 110 003. Delhi 110 003.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Exemptions, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Income Tax Department, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Income Tax Department, 121, Nungambakkam High Road,
Chennai 600 034.
3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions)
Income Tax Department,
121, Nungambakkam High Road,
Chennai 600 034.
.. Respondent(s)
Page 1 of 6
W.P. No.11670 of 2022
PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the Writ Petitioner/ Assessee on the file of the First Respondent to quash the impugned order dated 19.03.2022 passed u/s 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2019-20 in DIN and Order No.ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1041052343(1) and consequently direct the First Respondent to complete the fresh assessment for the assessment year 2019-20 after getting the order from the Third Respondent in the pending proceedings u/s10(23C)(vi) of the said Act as well directing to grant reasonable/sufficient opportunity of hearing including furnishing of reasons for re-opening.
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.A.S.SriramanFor Respondents(s) : Mr.V.Mahalingam Senior Standing Counsel
ORDER
The present writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 19.03.2022 for the assessment year 2019-20 whereby the petitioner's claim for exemption in terms of Section 10 (23C) (vi) of the Income Tax Act, was rejected on the premise that their application for registration Page 2 of 6
W.P. No.11670 of 2022
under Section 10 (23C) (vi) was pending at the time when the impugned order of assessment was made.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequent to the impugned order, petitioner has now been granted a registration under Section 10 (23C) (vi) vide proceedings dated 27.04.2022. Importantly, the above registration would relate back to the assessment year 2017-18 onwards as could be seen from the following portions of the order dated 27.04.2022:
“15. In the assessee's case, the application has been filed on 01.09.2017 and the assessee becomes eligible for exemption u/s.10(23C)(vi) of the Act from the A.Y. 2017-18 onwards.”
3. On this being pointed out, learned counsel for respondent would submit that they would re do the assessment taking into account the subsequent development.
4. In view thereof, the impugned order is set aside. The petitioner is at liberty to file the order dated 27.04.2022 and file additional
Page 3 of 6
W.P. No.11670 of 2022
submission, if any, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondents shall ensure that the petitioner has
access to the portal to enable them to upload the above order and objections if any. The respondents shall redo the assessment taking into account the above order and in accordance with law after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex:Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nospp
08.04.2025
Page 4 of 6
To:
Page 3 of 6
W.P. No.11670 of 2022
submission, if any, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondents shall ensure that the petitioner has
access to the portal to enable them to upload the above order and objections if any. The respondents shall redo the assessment taking into account the above order and in accordance with law after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex:Yes/NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nospp
08.04.2025
Page 4 of 6
To:
1. The Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi 110 003. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi, E-Ramp, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Delhi 110 003.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Income Tax Department, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034. Exemptions, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Income Tax Department, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034.
3. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Income Tax Department, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034. Income Tax Department, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034.
Page 5 of 6
W.P. No.11670 of 2022
Page 6 of 6
W.P. No.11670 of 2022
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
spp
W.P. No.11670 of 2022andW.M.P.Nos.11136, 11139 and 11140 of 2022
08.04.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.