Reported In Cit v. C.n.ramachandran Nair
High Court
21 Feb 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Reported In Cit v. C.n.ramachandran Nair
Date of order
21 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Reported In Cit v. C.n.ramachandran Nair, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
MONDAY, THE 21ST FEBRUARY 2011 / 2ND PHALGUNA 1932
ITA.No. 10 of 2007()
-------------------------------
(AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
COCHIN BENCH IN INT.T.A.NO.10/COCH/2006 DTD. 11/07/2006)
.........
APPELLANT/APPELLANT:
---------------------------------------
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
TRICHUR.
BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE K. GEORGE, SC, IT
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT:
---------------------------------------------------
M/S.MASTER LINK LEASING AND FINANCE LTD.,
KUNNAMKULAM, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 21/02/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Kss
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &K. SURENDRA MOHAN, JJ.
------------------------------------------------------------
I.T.A. NO: 10 OF 2007
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 21[st] February, 2011.
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair, J.
The issue raised is covered by judgment of this Court
reported in CIT v. Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd.(220 CTR 286). Following the said judgment we allow theappeal by reversing the order of the Tribunal and that of the firstappellate authority and remand the matter to the AssessingOfficer to revise the assessment in accordance with the judgmentafter giving an opportunity to the assessee also.
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
Judge
jj
K. SURENDRA MOHANJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.