– v. ….Opposite Parties
High Court
13 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
– v. ….Opposite Parties
Date of order
13 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In – v. ….Opposite Parties, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 68, Section 69, Section 271 of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: 6. // 3 // The writ petition is disposed of
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.26644 of 2024
Tapaswini Patel
….
Petitioner
–Represented By Adv. Mr. S.A. Swain, Advocate
-versus-
….Opposite Parties
Income Tax Officer, Jharsuguda and others
–Represented By Adv.
Mr. Tapan Das, Junior Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
13.11.2024
Order No.
1.1.Mr. Swain, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, prayer of his client is for revenue to make proper discovery by production of good evidence and meanwhile desist from taking coercive action against her. He submits, there be such direction for revenue to exercise power under section 131 in Income Tax Act, 1961. His client has no connection with M/s. Vaishnodevi Highway
Fuels.
2.Mr. Das, learned advocate, Junior Standing Counsel appears on
behalf of revenue and submits, show cause notice dated 18[th] July, 2023 was issued on imposition of penalty in respect of reassessment for assessment year 2018-19. As such, there is no scope for petitioner to pray for revenue being directed to make further discovery as provided under section 131 in Income Tax Act, 1961. The writ petition be dismissed.
3.Mr. Swain in reply submits, his client has filed appeal before the First Appellate Authority. The appeal was filed on 19[th] March, 2024. He hands up the acknowledgement with copy to Mr. Das.
4.We find from said show cause notice dated 18[th] July, 2023, there was reopening and reassessment regarding unexplained source of income under section 68 and unexplained expenditure under section 69-C. Assessment order was issued and pursuant thereto, the show cause notice for imposition and recovery of penalty under section 271-AAC (1). Petitioner says she has preferred appeal.
5.Considering petitioner sought to take steps to obtain statutory remedy of appeal, the writ petition is not maintainable. We request the first appellate authority to expedite the appeal on liberty granted to petitioner to produce website copy of this order.
6.
// 3 //
The writ petition is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge
Sks
Signature Not Verified
Digitally SignedSigned by: SISIR KUMAR SETHIReason: AuthenticationLocation: ORISSA HIGH COURTDate: 13-Nov-2024 18:29:03
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.