Case LawHigh Court › Income Tax Case

Income Tax Case

High Court 22 Oct 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
v. …. Opposite Parties
Date of order
22 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In this case, the High Court (2024) decided the matter under Section 10 of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: 4.The writ petition is disposed of

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Order No.01. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.23318 of 2024 …. Petitioner Guru Nanak Public School, Rourkela Represented by Advocate(s) – Mr. S. Ray, Senior Advocate Mr. K.K. Sahoo, Advocate Mr. D.K. Samal, Advocate -Versus- …. Opposite Parties Director General (Exemption) Income Tax, Delhi and others Represented by Advocate(s) – Mr. S. C. Mohanty, Advocate (Senior Standing Counsel) CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO ORDER 22.10.2024 1.Mr. Ray, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client made application on 8[th] May, 2024 to avail exemption under section 10(23C) (vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The application was made pursuant to purported demand dated 9[th] August, 2024 pertaining to assessment year 2012-13 on reassessment and penalty. He submits, there be direction for expeditious disposal of the application and in the meantime revenue restrained from enforcing the demand. 2.Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate, Senior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of revenue and submits, the application will be expeditiously disposed of. 3.Opposite party no.2 is directed to expeditiously deal with the application, preferably within two weeks from communication of this order. We make it clear that this direction is made without us expressing anything regarding petitioner’s contention. 4.The writ petition is disposed of. (Arindam Sinha) Judge (M.S. Sahoo) Judge Signature Not VerifiedPrasant Prasant Digitally SignedSigned by: PRASANT KUMAR SAHOOReason: AuthenticationLocation: Orissa High CourtDate: 22-Oct-2024 18:39:23
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan