Represented v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Government Of India
High Court
01 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Represented v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Government Of India
Date of order
01 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Represented v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Government Of India, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 246A of the Income-tax Act.
Decision: I have not gone into the merits of the matter.2/4 W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025 5.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 01.09.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025
and
W.M.P.(MD)Nos.18524 and 18527 of 2025
M/s Sri Sairam Tex,
Represented through its Managing Partner, N.Ganesan, No 14 Periyar Nagar, 2nd Cross, Karur - 639 002.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Government of India,
New Delhi.
2.The Jurisdictional Assessing Officer,
Income Tax Department,
Ward -1, Karur, Tamil Nadu.
... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records pertaining to the impugned assessment order dated 10.01.2025 and its consequential demand notice dated 10.01.2025 issued by the respondents for the assessment year 2017-18 and quash the same.
1/4
For Petitioner
: Mr.K.Manikandan
For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilipkumar
W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025
ORDER
Heard both sides.
2.The petitioner challenges the assessment order as well as the consequential demand notice issued by the second respondent.
3.The learned standing counsel for the respondents points out that the petitioner can very well file an appeal before the appellate authority. It appears that the appeal time has already expired.
4.Considering the special facts and circumstances of this case, I permit the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act. If such an appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, it shall be entertained by the appellate authority without reference to limitation and dealt with the same on merits and in accordance with law. I have not gone into the merits of the matter.2/4
W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025
5.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes/ Noias
01.09.2025
3/4
4/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
ias
W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025
01.09.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.