Case LawHigh Court › Represented v. The Principal Commissione...

Represented v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Government Of India

High Court 01 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Represented v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Government Of India
Date of order
01 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Represented v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Government Of India, the High Court (2025) decided the matter under Section 246A of the Income-tax Act.

Decision: I have not gone into the merits of the matter.2/4 W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025 5.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.18524 and 18527 of 2025 M/s Sri Sairam Tex, Represented through its Managing Partner, N.Ganesan, No 14 Periyar Nagar, 2nd Cross, Karur - 639 002. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Income Tax Department, Government of India, New Delhi. 2.The Jurisdictional Assessing Officer, Income Tax Department, Ward -1, Karur, Tamil Nadu. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records pertaining to the impugned assessment order dated 10.01.2025 and its consequential demand notice dated 10.01.2025 issued by the respondents for the assessment year 2017-18 and quash the same. 1/4 For Petitioner : Mr.K.Manikandan For Respondents : Mr.N.Dilipkumar W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025 ORDER Heard both sides. 2.The petitioner challenges the assessment order as well as the consequential demand notice issued by the second respondent. 3.The learned standing counsel for the respondents points out that the petitioner can very well file an appeal before the appellate authority. It appears that the appeal time has already expired. 4.Considering the special facts and circumstances of this case, I permit the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act. If such an appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, it shall be entertained by the appellate authority without reference to limitation and dealt with the same on merits and in accordance with law. I have not gone into the merits of the matter.2/4 W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025 5.This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. NCC : Yes/NoIndex : Yes / NoInternet : Yes/ Noias 01.09.2025 3/4 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias W.P(MD)No.23601 of 2025 01.09.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan