Case Law › High Court › Revenue v. Respondant: Amarchand Nahata(...

Revenue v. Respondant: Amarchand Nahata(Assessee)

High Court 01 Apr 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

01 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Revenue v. Respondant: Amarchand Nahata(Assessee), the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

11 ‘WV “7 gfgxOf 2005/ \ livi3ion Bench APPELLANT (Revenue) VERSUS /RESPONDANT: Amarchand Nahata(Assessee)C/o Theatre Prashant‘Dhamtari (C.G). INCOME TAX APPEAL UNDER SECTION 26‘0/y—A OF THE INCOME — TAX ACT, 1961 30 ’lll’l1'lwarUmUlVUu[YVITME’IVUETITUJU,LllTaUUVClllVUl’l’lU"Au ’” VI~\.,/\/VPS‘%WW%\/a7Va”?kmfgw7’7AM,M/Wa/wv’?”%w7?A4?‘Q/m/w#70 [ W](“97-«90£¢MJ$F?9$7xf”WaéA$MW‘“?go/zgYI(9J9[“V41]illL‘yaw/WWW¥wmwwm£E§§WW3W4)Wfkz(aw)mm%ue %\/

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.