Case LawHigh Court › Revenue v. R.k.dhawan

Revenue v. R.k.dhawan

High Court 03 Oct 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Revenue v. R.k.dhawan
Date of order
03 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
1994-95, 1992-93
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Revenue v. R.k.dhawan, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the fact that we have dismissed the appeal of the Revenue arising from order dated 10[th]December, 2002 passed by the Tribunal in ITA No.2994/Del/95; the present appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : 25.09.2008 % Judgment delivered on : 03.10.2008 + ITA 63/2004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Revenue versus R.K.DHAWAN ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Revenue : Mr .R.D.Jolly For the Respondent : Mr Hemant KrChaudhary CORAM :- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? be allowed to see the judgment ? 2. To be referred to Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? in the Digest ? RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) preferred by the Revenue against the judgment dated 29[th ]April, 2003 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITA No. 63 of 2004 Page 1 of 2 (hereinafter referred to in short as “Tribunal”) in ITA No. 5012/Del/1997 in respect of assessment year 1994-95. In passing the impugned judgment the Tribunal had relied upon its order dated 10[th] December, 2002 passed in ITA No.2994/Del/95, in respect of, assessment year 1992-93. In view of the fact that we have dismissed the appeal of the Revenue arising from order dated 10[th]December, 2002 passed by the Tribunal in ITA No.2994/Del/95; the present appeal is dismissed. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J October 03, 2008 da ITA No. 63 of 2004 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan