Revp/52/2011 Of M/S Univeb Sleepers Pvt. Ltd. Durg v. Assitt.commissioner Of Incometax Bhilai
High Court
09 Dec 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Revp/52/2011 Of M/S Univeb Sleepers Pvt. Ltd. Durg v. Assitt.commissioner Of Incometax Bhilai
Date of order
09 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Revp/52/2011 Of M/S Univeb Sleepers Pvt. Ltd. Durg v. Assitt.commissioner Of Incometax Bhilai, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 6.In view of the above submissions jointly made by counsel for theparties, this Review Petition is dismissed in terms of the order dated 8thSeptember, 2011 passed in Review Petition No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
^
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
D.B.:HON'BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA. &HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR. JJ.
fREVIEW PETITION UNDER RULE 90 OF THE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH RULES 20071
Appearance :
Mr. Mulchand Jain and Mr.Ashok Patil/Advocates forthe applicant.
Mr. Anand Dadariya, Advocate for the respondent.
ORDER
(09.12.2013)
SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
1.I.A.1 allowed. Delay condoned.
2.Heard.
3.The applicant is seeking review of the order dated 6th October,2010, passed in Tax Case (Income Tax Appeal) No.33 of 2008.The saidorder relates to assessment year 2004-2005.
4.It is jointly submitted by the counsel for both the parties that a similar
.-•'.•'v"~^^s^^^'%."^^^-'K-y^
order on the same grounds was passed between the same parties for another assessment year, in which, Review Petition No.59/2011 was preferredby the applicant and the same was dismissed by the High Court on 8thSeptember, 2011 by passing a reasoned order.
5.Learned counsel for both the parties submit that this Review Petitionmay also be dismissed in terms of the order dated 8th September, 2011passed in Review Petition No. 59/2011.
6.In view of the above submissions jointly made by counsel for theparties, this Review Petition is dismissed in terms of the order dated 8thSeptember, 2011 passed in Review Petition No. 59/2011.
Sd/-Sunil Kumar SinhaJudge
Sd/-R.N. ChandrakarJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.