Revp v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur
High Court
24 Aug 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Revp v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur
Date of order
24 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Revp v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Raipur, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: I Also heard on admission.Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any errorapparent on the face of record.Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.-Sd/-Sd/-Acting Chief JusticeDilip Raosaheb Deshmukh,Judge
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ii':l.u-i
HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Division Bench
Coram:Hon'bleShriJagdishBhalla,ActingG.J.&Hon'ble Shri Dilip RaosahebDeshmukh, J.
Review Petition No.54of 2007
Petitioner
M/s Raj Construction, Station Road,Durg (C.G.)
yersus
Resoondent
Commissioneroflncome Tax.Raipur
Petition under Chaoter VIRule 75 of the Hiah Court of@hhattisaarh Rules. 2005
Present:Shri Ashok Patil, counseLfor thepetitioner.Shri Amit Choudhary, counsel for the respondent.
ORALORDER(Passed on 24th August, 2067)
ThefollowingoralorderoftheCourtwaspassedbyHon'bteShri Jagdish Bhalla, ActingChiefJustice :
Heard on I.A.No.2, an application forcohdonation of delay infiling the review pet'rtion.
Thegroundmentionedintheapplicationforcondonationofdelay'issufficient..
•'-<^
Learned counsel for the respondent does not have any objection•.ifthedelayiscondoned.
AGcordingly,I.A.No.2 is allpwed andthe delay in filing the reyiewpetition iscondoned.
I
Also heard on admission.Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any errorapparent on the face of record.Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.-Sd/-Sd/-Acting Chief JusticeDilip Raosaheb Deshmukh,Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue