Rishita v. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
High Court
25 Jul 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Rishita v. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
Date of order
25 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rishita v. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed for havingrendered infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
[2025:RJ-JP:28114]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2731/2019
Rishita W/o Shri Mitesh D/o Shri Badranayaran Sirohiya, AtPresent Residing At Sirohiya Bhawan Sirohiya Ki Dhani, NearMuhana Mod, Sanganer Jaipur Raj. At Present Tenant Of Plot No.M-48, Income Tax Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Mitesh S/o Shri Bajrang Verma, R/o Plot No. 8, SindicateSociety, Hanuman Cross Road, No. 2 Virle Parle EastMumbai.Society, Hanuman Cross Road, No. 2 Virle Parle EastMumbai.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar SainFor Respondent(s): Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP For Respondent(s): Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
25/07/2025
Order
1.Learned counsel for petitioner submits that by efflux of time,the present revision petition has rendered infructuous.
2.Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed for havingrendered infructuous.
3.Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J
CHETNA BEHRANI /83
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.