Riviera Apartment Owners Cooperative Housing Society v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
High Court
14 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Riviera Apartment Owners Cooperative Housing Society v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
Date of order
14 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Riviera Apartment Owners Cooperative Housing Society v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The writ petition is allowed in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 3897/2017
RIVIERA APARTMENT OWNERS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY ..... PetitionerThrough : Sh. S. Krishnan, Advocate.
versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through : Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counel with Sh. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
O R D E R% 14.08.2018
The petitioner’s claim is for directions to the respondents to grant it permission under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to place on record belated returns for Assessment Years (AYs) 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11. It is stated that for this relevant period, the petitioner Society was under administration. In support of this argument, the petitioner relies upon orders made by the GNCTD [Registrar Cooperative Societies] appointing Administrators on diverse dates – 23.07.2008, 03.09.2008, 18.03.2009, 29.04.2011, 01.11.2011 and 19.01.2012.
This position is not contested by the Revenue; however, it states that the defaults had occurred even prior to the placing of the
petitioner under the Administrator. It is also urged on behalf of the Revenue that interest claims for TDS refund cannot be processed as they are inadmissible in law.
Having regard to the submissions of the parties, it appears to the Court that the petitioner is unable to file returns on account of some persistent omission by the various Administrators who were in charge of its affairs at relevant times. In the circumstances, interest of justice clearly lies in granting the petitioner the relief it seeks, of filing belated returns. A direction is issued accordingly to the respondents to take on record belated returns for the relevant period, i.e. AYs 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11, provided they are filed within four weeks from today. These returns shall be processed in accordance with law and proper orders made with respect to the refund amounts, if any, admissible.
The writ petition is allowed in the above terms.
Order dasti.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
AUGUST 14, 2018/ajk
A. K. CHAWLA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.