R.kamalanand v. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
High Court
18 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
R.kamalanand v. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Date of order
18 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In R.kamalanand v. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: Thus, the relief as such sought for is devoid of merits and accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAMW.P.No.42134 of 2016
R.Kamalanand
... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Rep. by its Chairman, Anna Salai,
Chennai – 600 002.
2.The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,
by its Chairman and Managing Director,
Head Quarters Complex, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
... Respondents
Prayer :Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue
a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to consider the
representation of the petitioner dated 24.11.2016 and appoint the petitioner to the post of Technical Assistant / Electrical / Mechanical forthwith in the existing or future vacancies on the basis of the apprenticeship training.
For Petitioner: Mr.G.VasudevanFor Respondents: Mr.P.Subramanian for TANGEDCO
W.P.No.42134 of 2016
ORDER
The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the writ petitioner dated 24.11.2016 and appoint
the petitioner to the post of Technical Assistant/Electrical/Mechanical forthwith in the existing or future vacancies on the basis of the apprenticeship training.
2.The petitioner states that he has completed Diploma in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and undergone apprenticeship training under the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 at Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Trichy from 18.12.2002 to 17.12.2003 i.e., the field of Electrical and Electronics Engineering. Though, the petitioner is fully qualified for appointment, his case was not considered. Thus, he made a representation to the authorities competent who in turn, failed to consider and consequently, the present writ petition is filed.
W.P.No.42134 of 2016
3.Appointment can never be claimed as an absolute right. Appointments are to be made strictly in accordance with the rules in force. Mere eligibility for appointment would not be a ground to file a writ petition for issuing a direction to provide appointment. The preference granted to apprenticeship trainings were dispensed with by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and as per the recruitment rules, the petitioner has to participate in the open competitive process in accordance with the rules in force. Even at the time of filing of the writ petition, the petitioner was aged about 37 years and now he would be around 43 years. Thus, the relief as such sought for is devoid of merits and accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No Costs.
Index : YesInternet : YesSpeaking orderssr
22.09.2022
To
1. The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,
Rep. by its Chairman, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
W.P.No.42134 of 2016
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
ssr
2.The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., by its Chairman and Managing Director, Head Quarters Complex, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
W.P.No.42134 of 2016
22.09.2022
4/4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.