R.l.traders v. Income Tax Officer Ward 29 (1)Through :Mr Rohit Madan

$~17 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 215/2015 R.L.TRADERS..... PetitionerThrough :Mr K. R. Manjani with MR B. K. Manjani versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 29 (1)Through :Mr Rohit Madan ..... Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMEDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R%13.01.2015 This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 25.09.2014 passed in aMiscellaneous Application being MA 63/Del/2014 in ITA 3755/Del/2013 pertainingto the assessment year 2010-11.By virtue of the said MA, the petitioner soughtrectification of the Tribunal’s order dated 21.02.2014 passed, inter alia, in ITA3755/Del/2013. Mr Manjani, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, statesthat an appeal has already been filed against that order of the Tribunal (i.e. order dated21.02.2014) and the ITA is numbered as ITA 743/2014 and the same is pendingbefore another Division Bench of this Court. We have examined the impugned order and find that the Tribunal has refusedto entertain the application on the ground that there is no mistake apparent on therecord requiring a rectification. Since no review of an order passed by the Tribunal is permissible in law, the only remedy available to the petitioner was to file an appealagainst the original order dated 21.02.2014. That, the petitioner has done. In these circumstances, we find no merit in the present writ petition. Since allthe facts are available on record, it will, however, be open to the petitioner to take up the pleas in the appeal pending before this Court. The writ petition is dismissed. BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J JANUARY 13, 2015SR SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J