Robo India Finance Ltd., Mumbai v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(3),Mumbai & Ors
High Court
04 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Robo India Finance Ltd., Mumbai v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(3),Mumbai & Ors
Date of order
04 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Robo India Finance Ltd., Mumbai v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1(3),Mumbai & Ors, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
WRIT PETITION NO. 520 OF 2011
Robo India Finance Ltd., Mumbai..Petitioner.
Vs.
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 1(3),Mumbai & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr. P.J. Pardiwala i/by Atul K. Jasani for the Petitioner.Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Respondents.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 4TH JULY, 2011.
P.C.
1.In view of the subsequent events that took place after filing of the present petition, learned Counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the petition.
2.Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
( A.A. SAYED, J. )
( J.P. DEVADHAR , J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue