Case LawHigh Court › Roha Dyechem Ltd v. Dated : 25Th January...

Roha Dyechem Ltd v. Dated : 25Th January, 2012

High Court 25 Jan 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Roha Dyechem Ltd v. Dated : 25Th January, 2012
Date of order
25 Jan 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Roha Dyechem Ltd v. Dated : 25Th January, 2012, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: DATED : 25TH JANUARY, 2012 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in recalling its order on an Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee by following the judgment of this Court in the case of Associated Capsules Pvt.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
sas IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL(LOD) NO.1519 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-IV, Mumbai..Appellant. V/s. Roha Dyechem Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Arvind Pinto for the appellant. Mr. V. Murlidhar with B.G. Yewale i/b. Rajesh Shah & Co. for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.R. JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 25TH JANUARY, 2012 P.C. :- 1.Whether the ITAT was justified in recalling its order on an Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee by following the judgment of this Court in the case of Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. V/s. DCIT reported in [2011] 332 ITR 42 (Bom), is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The decision of this Court in the case of Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. (supra) was delivered on 10th January, 2011. On 14th January, 2011, the appeal filed by the assessee was disposed of by the ITAT, without noticing the judgment delivered by this Court in the case of Associated Capsules Pvt. Ltd. On an Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee, the ITAT recalled its original order and passed fresh order in the light of the aforesaid judgment of this Court. Since, the order was passed by the ITAT without considering the law laid down by this Court, in our opinion, no fault can be found with the decision of the ITAT in allowing the Miscellaneous Application. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (A.R. JOSHI, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan