Rolta India Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Rolta India Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rolta India Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4667 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4667 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4667 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2759 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2759 OF 2007
Rolta India Ltd. .. Appellant
Vs.
The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax .. Respondent
Mr.Sameer Dalal for Appellant.
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 15th April, 2008
DATE : 15th April, 2008
DATE : 15th April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By
this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking
condonation of 1049 days’ delay caused in filing the
Appeal. For the reasons stated in the
affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, specially
in paragraph Nos.3, 4 & 5, sufficient cause is made out
for condonation of delay, and there is no case of
inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of
the Appellant. It is stated that the Appellant was
pursuing for alternate remedy. Having regard to the
facts and circumstances of the case, the Notice of
Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission in the
month of July-2008, subject to numbering.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.