Room v. The Indian Hotels Company Ltd
High Court
12 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Room v. The Indian Hotels Company Ltd
Date of order
12 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Room v. The Indian Hotels Company Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In view of dismissal of notice of motion, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION No. 3759 OF 2008 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2964 OF 2008.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 3759 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2964 OF 2008.
The Commissioner of Income-tax-2
Room No. 384 ..Appellant.
Vs
The Indian Hotels Company Ltd ..Respondent.
Mr P. S. Sahadevan, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr P. C. Tripathi, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED: 12th DECEMBER, 2008.
DATED: 12th DECEMBER, 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:----
----
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant
and the learned counsel for the Respondent.
2. Perused the notice of motion and affidavit in
support of notice of motion.
3. In the above appeal, the appellant has
challenged the judgment and order dated 12.09.2006.
The Chief Commissioner granted approval to file an
appeal on 11.4.2007. However, the appeal came to be
lodged on 4.9.2008 i.e. after lapse of almost one
year and five months. Only reason given is that the
delay has occurred due to administrative difficulty
and for reasonable cause being beyond the control of
the Department.
4. However, the affidavit in support of notice of
motion states that delay is not due to carelessness
and negligence on the part of the appellant. We are
not at all satisfied with the reasoning given in the
affidavit. No case is made out for condoning the
delay.
5. In the above circumstances, we are left with
no alternative but to dismiss the notice of motion for
want of sufficient cause in filing the appeal
belatedly.
6. In the result, notice of motion stands
dismissed.
7. In view of dismissal of notice of motion,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(V.C. DAGA,J)
(V.C. DAGA,J)(DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(V.C. DAGA,J)
(DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.