Ross Objector Objector\\^^S^'r--^" v. Espondent

r;;-.i,.s«a« INTHE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR•^TAX CASE No.c^ -i-OF 2014 APPELLANT fURENDRA KUMAR JAIN, S/0 Shri ROSS OBJECTOR OBJECTORJ.P JAin, Aged about 72^\\^s.'—years,R/o Panchvati, 5- SultanpurR--^"f^-" ^-"\\^..'°°Farms, Gadaipur Village: Chatarpur, New^s^'R--^"Delhi-30^\\^s.'—years,R/o Panchvati, 5- SultanpurR--^"f^-" ^-"\\^..'°°Farms, Gadaipur Village: Chatarpur, New^s^'R--^"Delhi-30 ROSS OBJECTOR OBJECTOR\\^^s^'R--^" •»s" VERSUS ESPONDENT: ,DEPUTYCOMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX,SPECIAL RANGE,BHILAI,DIST:DURG (C.G.) APPEAL UN'DER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT. 1961 ^,. •» Amit HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURDIVISION BENCH CORAM:HON'BLESHRIYATINDRASINGH, C.J.HON'BLE SHRI PRITINKER DIWAKER, JHON'BLE SHRI PRITINKER DIWAKER, J TaxCase No. 27 oF 2014 APPELLANT :Surendra KumarJain.CROSS OBJECTOR VERSUS RESPONDENT :DeputyCommissioneroFlncomeTax.Durg.APPEAL UNDER SECTION 260A OF T.HE INCOME TAX ACT, 1 961 Appearance: Shri Ajay Vohra, Rohifc Jain and Shri Vaibhav Shukla, Advocafces For the Appellant. Shri Anand Dadariya, Advocate for the Respondent. JUDGEMENT (27th June,2014) 1;The counsel for the Appellant states fchat he may be permitted towithdraw this tax case with liberty to File separate cross objection in ITANos. 6 oF 2005,7 of 2005, 8 oF 2005 and 9 oF 2005. 2. This tax case is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- ^Sd/-Chief Justice Sd/- Pritinker DiwakerJudge