Roxy Exports Ltd v. Commissioiner Of Income Tax Ludhiana
High Court
15 Jan 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Roxy Exports Ltd v. Commissioiner Of Income Tax Ludhiana
Date of order
15 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Roxy Exports Ltd v. Commissioiner Of Income Tax Ludhiana, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the said fact, present appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision: 15.1.2013 ITA No. 118 of 2012 (O&M)
Roxy Exports Ltd
.....Appellant
vs.
Commissioiner of Income Tax Ludhiana.....Respondent
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: -Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate for the appellant.
...
Present appeal under Section 260-A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 (for short the 'Act') arises out of an order passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh on 17.11.2011,whereby the matter was remitted back to the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals) after setting aside the order passed by it.Learned Tribunal passed such order observing that the matterrequires to be re-examined in the light of the principles laid downby the Hon'ble Delhi High in the case of (2008) 299 ITR 268(Delhi,Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Divine Leasing andFinance Ltdand a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court reported as(2008) 6 DTR 308 (SC),Commissioner of Income Tax vs. LovelyExports P. Ltd.
Since, the order passed by the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals) have been set aside and the matter has been remittedback for fresh decsion, we do not find any substantial question of
law arises for consideration from the orders passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal.
In view of the said fact, present appeal is accordingly
dismissed.
Needless to say, it shall be open to the appellant to raise allarguments, as are sought to be raised before this court, before theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in support of the plea that theadditions cannot be made in the hands of the appellant.
(HEMANT GUPTA)JUDGE
15.1.2013preeti
(RITU BAHRI)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.