Rp/100007/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Jai Ganesh Builders And Developers
High Court
20 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100007/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Jai Ganesh Builders And Developers
Date of order
20 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rp/100007/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Jai Ganesh Builders And Developers, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In the circumstance, this Review Petition is allowed.Order dated 16.12.2015 is recalled.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20[th]DAY OF JUNE 2018
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA|
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR.
REVIEW PETITION No.10000/7 of JZOIn ITA NO.100105 of 2015
BETWEEN
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAXOF INCOME TAX
DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER|WARD-1(1), BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI WARD-1(1), BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI
.. PETITIONERS|
(By Sri. Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND
M/S JAI GANESH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS
299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD, BELAGAVIPAN: AAFFJ 7/73
.. RESPONDENT
THIS|REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVIL|RULE 5 R/W. SEC. 151 OF CPC., PRAYING TO REVIEW THE,ORDER DTD 16.12.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.100105/2015 ON|THE FILE OF HON BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD|BENCH..
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION|THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Shri. Ravi Raj, learned counsel for thepetitioners.
2).Shri. Ravi Raj, learned standing counsel for therevenue submits that by inadvertence a submission was.made before this Court when the Income Tax Appeal was.being heard that the subject matter of appeal was coveredby Circular No.21/2015 in F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt) dated 10.12.2015, on the assumption that tax effect in theappeal is less than rupees twenty lakhs. It was)subsequently noticed that the tax effect in the appeal ismore than rupees twenty lakns. Hence, the Circular in)question is not applicable to the facts of this case.Accordingly, ne prays that this review petition may be)allowed and the Income Tax Appeal may be restored on.file for consideration by this Court.
3.His submission is placed on record.
In the circumstance, this Review Petition is allowed.Order dated 16.12.2015 is recalled. ITA No.100105 otg'2015 is restored on the file of this Court.
Registry is directed to list ITA No.100105 of 2015before appropriate bench for admission
Kmvy
Sd/-|JUDGE
Sd/-|JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.