Rp/100009/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Panchamukhi Builders
High Court
08 Feb 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100009/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Panchamukhi Builders
Date of order
08 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rp/100009/2016 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Panchamukhi Builders, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4In the circumstances, this Review Petition is allowed.Order dated 16.12.2015 its recalled.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THRB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKDHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 8 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017
BRRORE
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICK S.ABDUL NAZBER
ANT
THERE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUM
R.P.No. 1OOOO9 /20
INITA No.100130/2015
BEITWEHR
1.THR PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDr. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROADBELAGAVIDr. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROADBELAGAVI
2.THERE INCOME TAX OFFICWARD-1(1), BELAGAVI
BBRLAGAVI .. PETITIONERS
(By Shri. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, CGC FOR
shri. Y.V.RAVIRAJ, Adv.,)
AND:
M/s.PANCHAMUKHI BUILDERS
299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD
BELAGAVI, PAN : AAJFP29607L ...RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PEITIION IS FILED UNDER ORDERXLVII RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER
DATED 16.12.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.100130/2015 ONTHE FILE OF HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,DHARWAD BENCH.
THIS|REVIEWPETITIONCOMING.ON|KORADMISSION THIS DAY, P.S. DINESH KUMAR, MADE THEROLLOWING
ORD BER
Heard Shri Jeevan J. Neeralgi, learned counsel forthe petitioners.
2.Shri Jeevan J. Neeralgi, learned standingcounsel forthe|petitionerssubmitsthat,?/inadvertence, a submission was made before this Courtwhen the Income Tax Appeal was being heard that thesubject matter of appeal was covered by CircularNo.21/20195 in F.No.279/ Misc. 142/2007-ITJU(Pt), d10.12.2015, on an assumption that, tax effect in theappeal is less than Rupees twenty lakhs. It wassubsequently noticed that the tax effect in the appeal ismore than Rupees twenty lakhs. Hence, the Circular in|question is not applicable to the facts of this case.Accordingly, he prays that this review petition may be
allowed and the Income Tax appeal may be restored on
file for consideration by this Court.
3.His submission is placed on record.
4In the circumstances, this Review Petition is
allowed.Order dated 16.12.2015 its recalled. ITANo.100130/2015 is restored on the file of this Court.
Registry is directed to list ITA No.100130/2015
before the appropriate bench for admission.
sd/-
JUDGE
od/-
JUDGE
:>G
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.