Rp/100015/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Biluru Gurubasava Pattina
High Court
20 Jul 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100015/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Biluru Gurubasava Pattina
Date of order
20 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/100015/2015 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Biluru Gurubasava Pattina, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,DHARWAD BENCH
DATLBD THIS THE 2 DAY OF JULY 2016
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA
REVISION PERTITION No. 100015 OF 2015 IITA No. 5006 OF 2013
BEIWEREN
1,THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELGAUM.DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELGAUM.
? INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-I, BAGALKOTWARD-I, BAGALKOT
(By Sri./Smt: Y.V.RAVIRAJ, Adv.)
—.. PRETITIONER
AND:
SRI. BILURU GURUBASAVA PATTINA
SAHAKARI SANGHA NIYAMITHABAGALKQO
—. RESPONDENT
AK AK AK
Review petition filed U/o.47 Rule 5 Read with Section 151 of CPC,praying to review the order dated 05.02.2014 passed in the ITA No. 5006/2013on the file of Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad. Bench, Dharwad.
This Review Petition coming on for Orders this day, the Hon’ble Courtpassed the following;
ORDER
Office objections raised on the review petition shall be complied in aweek’s time failing which the review petition stands dismissed without anyfurther order in this behalt.
SD /JUDGE.
//COPY/
Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 26.09.2016, theAdvocate for the Petitioner has not complied with the office objections,Hence, this RP No. 100015/2015 in ITA No. 5006/2013 stands dismissed aspet the Court order dated: 20.07.2016,
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
T By: ndR By:C By:
Sd/-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue