Rp/100118/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shree Jai Jinendra Credit
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100118/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shree Jai Jinendra Credit
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100118/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shree Jai Jinendra Credit, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF JANUARY, 2018)
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHAR.P. NO.100118/2017
BETWEEN :
1]THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),% FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJUI COMPLEX, OPPOSITE|TO CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,% FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJUI COMPLEX, OPPOSITE|TO CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BBRLAGAVI-59000 1
D _THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD NO.1(1), OPP. TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, NIPPANIT,
NIPPANI-59000 1
_.. PRHTITIONE
(BY SRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND:
SHREE JAI JINENDRA CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI NIYAMIT,|AT POsT SHAMNEWADIT,TALUK:CHIKKODI, BELAGAVI,REP. BY ITS MANAGEHBR MAHAVEES/O GUNDU UDAGAVE,AGED ABOUT 94 YEARS,OCC:SERVICE, R/O SHAMNEWADI,
TALUK:CHIKKODI, DIST:BELAGAVI-591201..
_. RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF)CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDER DATED 21.09.2015)PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100099/2014, ON.
THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BRNCH AT DHARWAD.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,|S.SUJATHA J..MADEB THR FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.|No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petition|deserves to be dismissecd.
oDIt is significant to note that this appeal is filed|with an inordinate delay of 689 days. No satisfactory|reasons are assigned to condone the delay. Hence, I.A.|seeking condonation of delay has to be rejected.
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.|No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order of this|Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
od/-|JUDGE|
JTR
od/-.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue