Rp/100128/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Mahalaxmi Urban
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100128/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Mahalaxmi Urban
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100128/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Mahalaxmi Urban, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BRENCH
DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF JANUARY, 2018.
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S. SUJATHA|
AN 1
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA
R.P.No.100128/2017
BETWEEN :
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,BELAGAVIL.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-1, GOKAK,WARD-1, GOKAK,
DIST: BBELAGAVI... PRTTTIONBR
(BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND:
SHRI MAHALAXMI URBAN CO-OPEBRATIVECREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,APMC ROAD, MUDALAGI,GOKAK-591 307,KARNATAKA.
... RESPONDEN
THIS PETITION [IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7 RULE 1 OCPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 21.09.2019.PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA No.100080/2014, ON.THE FILE OF HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BRNCH AT DHARWAD.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,|S.SUJATHA J..MADEB THR FOLLOWING:
7 OD 3
ORDER
In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.|No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petition|deserves to be dismissecd.
2.It is significant to note that this appeal is filed|with an inordinate delay of 692 days. No satisfactory|reasons are assigned to condone the delay. Hence, I.A.|seeking condonation of delay has to be rejected.
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.|No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order of this|Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
Sd/-
JUDGE|
Jm/-
Sd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue