Rp/100130/2017 Of The Commissioner Ofo Income Tax v. Shri. Laxmi Credit Souhard Sahakari Ltd
High Court
05 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100130/2017 Of The Commissioner Ofo Income Tax v. Shri. Laxmi Credit Souhard Sahakari Ltd
Date of order
05 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100130/2017 Of The Commissioner Ofo Income Tax v. Shri. Laxmi Credit Souhard Sahakari Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE O DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA
R.P. NO.100130/2017
BETWEEN :
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BBLAGAVI-590001
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD NO.1,
NIPPANI, DIST BELAGAVI|
_. PRHTITIONBRS.
(BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
ANT
SHRI. LAXMI CREDIT SOUHARD SAHAKARI LTD.,
o21, MAIN ROAD, AT POST: MANJARI,
TALUK: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591201
_. RESPONDENT
THIS PBRTITION IS FILED UNDBR ORDER XLVI] RULE 1 OFCPC PRAYING TO RBVIBW THR ORDBR DATBRD 21.09.2015PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100127/2014, ONTHE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD.
THIS PRTITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON [.A. THIS.DAY,S.SUJATHA J.,MADE THR FOLLOWING:
7 OD 3
ORDER
The issue involved in this review petition issquarely covered by the order of this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018. In view of thesame, the present review petition deserves to bedismissed.
2.It 1s significant to note that this petition isfiled with an inordinate delay of 692 days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. |
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
Sd/-JUDGE|
hnm|
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.