Case LawHigh Court › Rp/100133/2017 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Rp/100133/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Sri. Doodgangnga Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd

High Court 05 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100133/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Sri. Doodgangnga Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd
Date of order
05 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/100133/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Sri. Doodgangnga Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH. DATEBD THIS THE DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018| PRESENT THRE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA ANT) THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA R.P. NO.100133/2017 BETWEEN : 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)3RD FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEXOPPOSITEK TO CIVIL HOSPITALDR. AMBBDKAR ROADBBLAGAVI 590 OO]2.THER INCOME TAX OFFICKBWARD NO.1, NIPPANI|TALUK: CHIKKODI.DISTRICT. BELAGAVI.... PETITIONBRS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.) ANT SRI. DOODHGANGA CO-OPBRRATIVECREDIT SOCEITY LTD., KARADGATALUK: CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591201R/BY MANAGER|SHRI.DIPAK RAVASAHEB TAPKIRE,AGED:MAJOR,RESIDENT OF KARADGA, TALUK:CHIKODI.DISTRICT: BBELAGAVI-591297.., RESPONDENTTHIS PETITION IS FILED UNDEBR ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OFCPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDBR DATBED 21.09.2019PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100061/2014, ON.THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BRNCH AT DHARWAD. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON I.A. THIS|DAY,S.SUJATHA J..MADE THR FOLLOWING: ORDER The issue involved in this review petition issquarely covered by the order of this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018. In view of thesame, the present review petition deserves to bedismissed. 2.It 1s significant to note that this petition isfiled with an inordinate delay of 694 days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. | 3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017. Sd/-JUDGE| hnm Sd/-JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan