Case Law › High Court › Rp/100134/2017 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Rp/100134/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shri. Basava Co-Operative

High Court 05 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karhcdharwad

Parties

Date of order

05 Feb 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/100134/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shri. Basava Co-Operative, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH. DATEBD THIS THE DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018|PRESENT THRE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA AND. THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHABL CUNHA| R.P. NO.100134/2017 BBRIWEEN 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)3RD FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEXOPPOSITEK TO CIVIL HOSPITALDR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI 590 OO1. 3RD FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEXOPPOSITEK TO CIVIL HOSPITALDR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI 590 OO1. 2.THER INCOME TAX OFFICKBWARD NO.1, NIPPANI TALUK: CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. ... PETITIONERSWARD NO.1, NIPPANI TALUK: CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.) ANT SHRI. BASAVA CO-OPERATIVECREDIT SOCIETY LTD., JANAWAD,.TALUK: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI, BY ITS MANAGER, SHRILAPPASAB RAMU MANAKE,AGED: 38 YEARS, R/O: JANAWAD,| TALUK: CHIKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI. .. RESPONDENT THIS PBRTITION IS FILED UNDBR ORDER XLVI] RULE 1 OFCPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDBR DATBED 21.09.2019PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100059/2014, ON.THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BRNCH AT DHARWAD. THIS PRTITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON [.A. THIS.DAY,S.SUJATHA J..MADE THR FOLLOWING: 7 OD 3 ORDER The issue involved in this review petition issquarely covered by the order of this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018. In view of thesame, the present review petition deserves to bedismissed. 2.It 1s significant to note that this petition isfiled with an inordinate delay of 694 days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. | 3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017. Sd/-JUDGE| hnm| Sd/-JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.