Rp/100139/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Sree Renuka Co-Operative Credit
High Court
05 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100139/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Sree Renuka Co-Operative Credit
Date of order
05 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100139/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Sree Renuka Co-Operative Credit, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE O DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA
R.P. NO.100139/2017
BETWEHEN
THR INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD NO.1(1), NIPPANIBBRLAGAVI-591293
_.. PRHTITIONER
(BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
ANISRBB RENUKA CO-OPBRATIVE CREDITSOCIETY LTD., MAIN RAOD, ANKALIT,TALUK: CHIKKODIT, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI-591297R/BY ITS SECRETARYMR. PRAVEEN L. BADAGANVE
... RESPONDENT
THIS PRTITION [IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVIL RULE1 OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THRE ORDER DATED21.09.2015 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN NO.100086/2014, ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH|COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD.
THIS PRTITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON [.A.THIS DAY,S.SUJATHA J.,MADE THR FOLLOWING: |
7 OD 3
ORDER
The issue involved in this review petition issquarely covered by the order of this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018. In view of thesame, the present review petition deserves to bedismissed.
? It 1s significant to note that this petition isfiled with an inordinate delay of 689 days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. |
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
Sd/-
JUDGE|
hnm
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.