Rp/100140/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals) v. Shri Vardhaman Urban

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH. DATEBD THIS THE DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018|PRESENT THRE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA AND. THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHABL CUNHA| R.P. NO.100140/2017 BBRIWEEN 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)3RD FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX,3RD FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX, OPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI 590001DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI 590001 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD NO.1(1), OPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI 590001. _.. PHTITIONERS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.) ANT SHRI VARDHAMAN URBANCO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LITD., SS ROAD, TALUK: ATHANI, BELAGAVI,RBEPRBESEBENTBD BY ITS SKHCRETBAHUBALI BHARAMAPPA UPADHYE, |AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC : SERVICE, |RESIDENT OF 8.S.ROAD,TALUK: ATHANI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. _. RESPONDENT THIS PBRTITION IS FILED UNDBR ORDER XLVI] RULE 1 OFCPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDER DATED 21.09.2015PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100038/2014, ONTHE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON I.A. THIS|DAY,S.SUJATHA J..MADE THR FOLLOWING: ORDER The issue involved in this review petition issquarely covered by the order of this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018. In view of thesame, the present review petition deserves to bedismissed. ? It 1s significant to note that this petition isfiled with an inordinate delay of 693 days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. | 3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017. Sd/-JUDGE| hnm Sd/-JUDGE