Rp/100146/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Al-Mehdi Co-Operative Credit
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100146/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Al-Mehdi Co-Operative Credit
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100146/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Al-Mehdi Co-Operative Credit, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH.
DATBRD THIS THER DAY OF JANUARY, 2018
PRESENT
THRE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND.
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHABL CUNHA|
R.P. NO.100146/2017
R.P. NO. 1OQ00001/2
BETWEEN :
1.THER INCOME TAX OFFICKBWARD NO.1(1), AYAKAR BHAVAN|WARD NO.1(1), AYAKAR BHAVAN|
DIST. BELAGAVI.|
.. PETITIONER
(BY SRI: Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
AL-MBHDI CO-OPERATIVE |CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,RBEPRBSEBENTBD BY ITS SKHCRETSHRI GADAMPALLI IBRAHIMSUBHAS ROAD, SANKESHWARKUKKERI TALUK,BBRLAGAVI DISTRICT-591313.
—. RESPONDENT
THERESE PEHITIIONS ARE HKILED UNDER SECIION XLRULE 1 OF C.P.C. PRAYING TO RBVIBW THR ORDER DATED|21.09.2015 PASSBD BY THIS HON’BLKE COURT IN LTA.NOS.100051-52 OF 2014 ON THE FILE OF THR HON’BLE HIGHCOURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,|S.SUJATHA J.,MADEB THR FOLLOWING:
7 OD 3
ORDER
In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017dated22.01.2018,thesereviewpetitions deserve to be dismissed.|
?)It is significant to note that these appeals are
filed with an inordinate delay of 693 days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. |
3.Accordingly, review petitions as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
sd/-.JUDGE|
nnm
sd/-.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue