Rp/100152/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sayawwa Nagappa Kudri
High Court
27 Feb 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100152/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sayawwa Nagappa Kudri
Date of order
27 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/100152/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sayawwa Nagappa Kudri, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015
BHEFOR
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALIN.VENUGOPALA GOWD
REVIEW PEIITION No.100152 OF 2014
BEREITI#
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXOPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL,DR.B.R AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELGAUM.
2.THER INCOME TAX OFFICEWARD-I, BAGALKOT,— PRTITIONERS
(BY SRL Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
SAYAWWA NAGAPPA KUDRIA/P: BISANAL, SO: GALAGALI,TQ: BILGAI, DIST: BAGALKOT
(BY SRI. H.R-KAMBIYAVAR, ADV.)
~~ RESPONDENT
THIS REVIBW PERTITION IS FILED UNDEORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEWTHR ORDER DTD: O9.0/7.2014 PASSHKD IN TW.P.NO.105414/2014 (T-IT) ON THE FILE OF THEHON ’BLEHIGHCOURT|OF|KARNATAKA,DHARWAD BENCH.
THIS REVIEW PERTITION COMING ON FOORDERS, LHIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THEFOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.H.R.Kambiyavar,learnedadvocate,
volunteered to accept notice on behalf of respondent,
2. Sri.Y.V.Raviraj, learned advocate for thepetitioners, submitted that this petition has becomeinfructuous, in view of the refund granted by petitionerNo.2, pursuant to the direction issued, in the ordersought to be reviewed herein 1.e., passed on the originalside—writ petition.
Recording the submission of Sri.Y.V.Raviraj, thepetition 1sdisposed of,having becomeinfructuous
RK/-Ct: byg/-
SD/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.